Judgment briefs
From the courts
Every new Supreme Court judgment in its official headnote, plus reasoned judgments from the High Courts. Checked every morning.

Judgment alerts by email — one email a day with the headlines of new judgments.
- Judgments
- 365
- Decided in 2026
- 365
- Last 30 days
- 80
- Latest decision
- 19 Oct 2026
- Year covered
- 2026
- Courts
- 23
Outcomes
Other / not recorded 83
11 judgments Clear filters
- Deep Kumar @ Dalip Chand Presently in Custody at Modern Central Jail Colvale Goa v. State, (thr. Anti Narcotic Cell Police Station) Rep. By Public ProsecutorBombay HC Partly allowed
- Jainulabedin Abbasali Saiyed v. Noorbanu Ibrahim KureshiGujarat HC Partly allowed
- Sri R. Gopala Krishna v. the State of KarnatakaKarnataka HC Partly allowed
- [2026] 9 S.C.R. 574Securities India Act, 1992Supreme Court Partly allowedSecurities and Exchange Board of India v. Vedanta Limited & Ors.
- [2026] 7 S.C.R. 255MSEDCL Employees Services Regulations, 2005 – Dismissal from serviceSupreme Court Partly allowedSurekha Domaji Bele v. Executive Engineer, Testing Division, MSEDCL
- [2026] 4 S.C.R. 368Penal Code, 1860 – ss.294(b), 323, 324 and 302 rw s.34 – Culpable homicideSupreme Court Partly allowedSivakumar v. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police
- [2026] 4 S.C.R. 191Legal Aid –Supreme Court Partly allowedBhola Mahto v. The State of Jharkhand
- [2026] 3 S.C.R. 160Sports – Cricket – Applicability of the judgments in S.Nithya to the cricket associationsSupreme Court Partly allowedThe Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association v. Anna Nagar Cricket Club & Anr. Etc.
- [2026] 2 S.C.R. 455Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Deficiency the beauty salon in the appellant’s hotel for haircutSupreme Court Partly allowedITC Limited v. Aashna Roy
- [2026] 2 S.C.R. 381Whether the belated prayer of the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 795 of 2026, being the successors-in-interest of ‘NP’, to gain membership…Supreme Court Partly allowedShashin Patel and Anr. v. Uday Dalal and Ors.
- [2026] 1 S.C.R. 439Whether cognizance of the alleged offences u/ss.448 and 451, Companies Act, 2013 could have been taken on a private complaint in view…Supreme Court Partly allowedYerram Vijay Kumar v. The State of Telangana & Anr.
Source: Indian Supreme Court and High Court Judgments datasets, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0.