Vijaya Kumari S & Another v. Union of India
Issue arose whether the age-restrictions u/s.4(iii)(c)(I) of Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 should be applied to intending couples, all of whom had commenced…
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 9 Oct 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 11 S.C.R. 136
- Case no.
- WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 331/2024
- Bench
- B.v. Nagarathna, K.v. Viswanathan
Issue for consideration
Issue arose whether the age-restrictions u/s.4(iii)(c)(I) of Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 should be applied to intending couples, all of whom had commenced the surrogacy process, to the extent of having their embryos frozen, before the enforcement of Act, 2021 – s.4(iii)(c)(I) – Regulation of surrogacy and surrogacy procedures – Application of the age-restrictions on ‘intending couples’ u/s.4(iii)(c)(I) who had frozen their embryos, before the enforcement of the Act – Act of 2021 Act came into force
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim