Judgment briefsSupreme Court of India
Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. The State of Karnataka & Ors. R1: The State of Karnataka R2: Chndrumal R3: Sanjay R4: Nandkumar R5: Vijay
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 4 Nov 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 11 S.C.R. 246
- Case no.
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4728/2025
- Bench
- Pankaj Mithal, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Issue for consideration
Issue arose whether the direction for investigation to the police issued by the JMFC-Judicial Magistrate First Class u/s.156(3) CrPC which was quashed by the impugned orders, justified; had sufficient material before it so as to justify the course of action of referring the matter for investigation to the police invoking power u/s.156(3) of the Code, resulting in the institution of the FIR.
Judgment PDF: Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. The State of Karnataka & Ors. R1: The State of Karnataka R2: Chndrumal R3: Sanjay R4: Nandkumar R5: Vijay
AI judgment summary Incoming
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim