Judgment briefs
Supreme Court of India

The State, Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Satish Kumar & Ors.

Merely because a Central Government employee works within the territory of a particular State, whether the CBI requires consent from the concerned…

Allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1 Jan 2025
Citation
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 130
Case no.
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 898/2024
Bench
C.t. Ravikumar, Rajesh Bindal

Issue for consideration

Merely because a Central Government employee works within the territory of a particular State, whether the CBI requires consent from the concerned State Government to register an FIR against such Central Government employee in connection with commission of an Act; whether the High Court was justified in quashing the FIRs and the subsequent proceedings against the respondents holding that the same were vitiated in view of the lack of consent and the lack of notification for a Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Judgment PDF: The State, Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Satish Kumar & Ors.
AI judgment summary Incoming

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.

More from the Supreme Court of India

  1. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
  2. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
  3. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
  4. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim