Shripal & Anr. v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad
Whether the services of the appellant-workmen (gardeners) were terminated without complying with Sections 6E and 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act,…
Disposed of- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 31 Jan 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1427
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8157/2024
- Bench
- Vikram Nath, Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale
Issue for consideration
Whether the services of the appellant-workmen (gardeners) were terminated without complying with Sections 6E and 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appellants, if entitled to reinstatement with back wages as also regularization of their services. – ss.6E, 6N – Non-compliance with: Held: The pattern of direct oversight and wage disbursement negates the stand of the Respondent-Employer that the Appellant- Workmen were “contractor’s personnel” – Appellants were pressing for regularization and proper
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim