Judgment briefs
Supreme Court of India

1. The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority 2. Bangalore Development Authority v. 1. Smt. Rathnamma 2. Sri G Arvind 3. Smt. Radhamma

Preliminary notification u/s.17(1) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 was issued on 20.03.1999 proposing to acquire 4 acres and 15 guntas…

Allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
3 Jan 2025
Citation
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 1683
Case no.
CIVIL APPEAL No. 3764/2025

Issue for consideration

Preliminary notification u/s.17(1) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 was issued on 20.03.1999 proposing to acquire 4 acres and 15 guntas of land from The entire transaction with regard to acquisition and voluntary surrender of land under the Bangalore Development Authority (Incentive Scheme for Voluntary Surrender of Land) Rules, 1989 [the original Incentive Rules of 1989] as well as possession and also notification under

Judgment PDF: 1. The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority 2. Bangalore Development Authority v. 1. Smt. Rathnamma 2. Sri G Arvind 3. Smt. Radhamma
AI judgment summary Incoming

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.

More from the Supreme Court of India

  1. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
  2. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
  3. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
  4. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim