Sanjay Sadashiv Bendre & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Issue arose whether the reclassification of Leading Fireman/Tandel under the Recruitment Rules, 2014, as Class III, validly overrides the earlier classification under…
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 3 Mar 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1165
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3519/2025
- Bench
- Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta
Issue for consideration
Issue arose whether the reclassification of Leading Fireman/Tandel under the Recruitment Rules, 2014, as Class III, validly overrides the earlier classification under Appendix A of the MSR 1954, and consequently fixes the retirement age at 58 rather Regulations, 1954 – reg.66 – Pune Municipal Corporation (Recruitment & Classification of Services) Rules, 2014 – Retirement age – Retirement age of leading fireman/ tandel fixed at 60 years under MSR, 1954 – Retirement age reduced from 60 to 58 years by
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim