Ramesh Kumaran & Anr. v. State Through The Inspector of Police & Anr.
Cross-FIRs related to the same incident and for the same offences, with allegations and counter-allegations, were filed by two lawyers against each…
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 27 Mar 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1245
- Case no.
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1318/2025
- Bench
- Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan
Issue for consideration
Cross-FIRs related to the same incident and for the same offences, with allegations and counter-allegations, were filed by two lawyers against each other. The Supreme Court explored the possibility of an amicable settlement between – Art.142 – Cross-FIRs related to same incident and for the same offences, filed by two lawyers against each other – Both lawyers practising before the same Courts – Incident arose due to past animosity – Unconditional apology and undertakings tendered by both
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim