M/s ABCI Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others
Whether BRO-Border Road Organisation was justified in accepting the bid of Rs.1,569/-, and on the failure of the appellant-L1 bidder to execute…
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 13 Feb 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 3 S.C.R. 128
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2546/2025
- Bench
- Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar, K.v. Viswanathan
Issue for consideration
Whether BRO-Border Road Organisation was justified in accepting the bid of Rs.1,569/-, and on the failure of the appellant-L1 bidder to execute the agreement asking for forfeiture vide encashment of bank guarantee of – s.20 – Mistake of fact – Tender dispute – Forfeiture of bank guarantee/bid security on default – Respondent no.2- Border Road Organisation invited bids for the construction of tunnels and appellant ranked as L-1 bidder – When financial bids opened, the
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim