Jay Kishan and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2…
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 11 Feb 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 3 S.C.R. 65
- Case no.
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 727/2025
- Bench
- Sudhanshu Dhulia, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Issue for consideration
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. FIR against the appellants, if ought to Gangsters & Anti -Social Act ivi t ies (Prevention) Act, 1986 – ss.2, 3 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.420/406/120B/504/395/427/506 – Constitution of India – Article 21 – The allegations in the Criminal Cases (CCs) cited in the FIR to invoke the Gangsters Act
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim