Judgment briefsSupreme Court of India
Sakina Sultanali Sunesara (Momin) v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj & Ors
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – s.96, Ord.XXIII r.3, Ord.XLIII r.1A(2), r.1(m) – Compromise of suit
Dismissed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 23 Apr 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1921
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6681-6682/2023
- Bench
- Vikram Nath, Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale
Issue for consideration
Issue arose whether a litigant who was already a party to the suit, yet contests the fact or legality of a compromise embodied in a decree, is restricted to an application before the trial court under the proviso to Ord. XXIII r.3 CPC or appeal u/s.96 CPC notwithstanding s.96(3) CPC.
Judgment PDF: Sakina Sultanali Sunesara (Momin) v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj & Ors
AI judgment summary Incoming
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim