Larsen and Toubro Limited v. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Others
In petition u/s.34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Single Judge had set aside the Arbitral Award. Division Bench in appeal thereagainst u/s.37,…
Dismissed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 21 Apr 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2811
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2575/2016
- Bench
- Abhay S. Oka, Pankaj Mithal
Issue for consideration
In petition u/s.34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Single Judge had set aside the Arbitral Award. Division Bench in appeal thereagainst u/s.37, Arbitration Act by way of the impugned judgment, inter alia upheld the dismissal of L&T’s counter-claim findings of the Arbitral Tribunal that the Supplementary Agreement was a non-starter as it was vitiated by economic duress; that the Development Agreement was not novated by the Supplementary Agreement; that L&T committed fundamental breach of the Development Agreement. The operative part of
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim