Judgment briefsSupreme Court of India
Satauram Mandavi v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
Matter pertains to the retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6 POCSO Act, to the incident Retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6, to…
Partly allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 25 Jul 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1538
- Case no.
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3179/2025
- Bench
- Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6 POCSO Act, to the incident Retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6, to the incident took place prior to the amendment – Propriety – Commission of offence by the appellant on 20.05.2019 – Amended provision of s.6 POCSO Act, came into force on 16.08.2019 whereby the minimum sentence enhanced
Judgment PDF: Satauram Mandavi v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
AI judgment summary Incoming
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim