Judgment briefsSupreme Court of India
Tosh Kumar Sharma v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad & Ors. R1: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad R2: State of Uttar Pradesh R3: Selection & Appointment Committee of U.P.H.J.S. Examination
Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 – rr.8(2), 18(4) – Number of appointments to be made
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 16 Jul 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1998
- Case no.
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 9510/2025
- Bench
- Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the claim raised for appointment by post of Additional District and Sessions Judge in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service.
Judgment PDF: Tosh Kumar Sharma v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad & Ors. R1: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad R2: State of Uttar Pradesh R3: Selection & Appointment Committee of U.P.H.J.S. Examination
AI judgment summary Incoming
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim