Judgment briefs
Supreme Court of India

M/s Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Limited v. Regional PF Commissioner II and Recovery Officer, RO Bengaluru (Koramangala) & Anr.

Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions

Allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
26 Aug 2025
Citation
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 2183
Case no.
CIVIL APPEAL No. 11105/2025
Bench
Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol, Sandeep Mehta

Issue for consideration

Present appeal assails the correctness of the judgment of the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant-EARC and further directing that the amount deposited, vide be transmitted to the account of the respondent no.1 herein; priority of first charge amongst the EPFO and the secured creditors in view of s.11(2) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

Judgment PDF: M/s Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Limited v. Regional PF Commissioner II and Recovery Officer, RO Bengaluru (Koramangala) & Anr.
AI judgment summary Incoming

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.

More from the Supreme Court of India

  1. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
  2. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
  3. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
  4. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim