Judgment briefsSupreme Court of India
Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar v. The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)
Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss.276C(1), 245H(1) proviso to, 245D(4), 245I
Allowed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 28 Aug 2025
- Citation
- [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2199
- Case no.
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3777/2025
- Bench
- J.k. Maheshwari
Issue for consideration
Whether continuation of the prosecution initiated by the revenue u/s.276C(1), Income Tax Act, 1961 against the appellant after passing an order by the Settlement Commission, would amount to abuse of process of Court; of the present case, the High Court was justified to dismiss the quashing petition filed by the appellant, and if not, what relief can be granted.
Judgment PDF: Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar v. The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)
AI judgment summary Incoming
Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.
More from the Supreme Court of India
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
- [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim