Judgment briefs
Supreme Court of India

Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah & Ors.

Allegation against the respondent nos.1 and 2 that they raped a minor girl. It is admitted that they never committed the acts…

Disposed of
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1 Sep 2025
Citation
[2025] 9 S.C.R. 258
Case no.
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3813/2025
Bench
Sanjay Kumar, Satish Chandra Sharma

Issue for consideration

Allegation against the respondent nos.1 and 2 that they raped a minor girl. It is admitted that they never committed the acts together and always acted separately. In light of the controversy involved in the instant case, the two question arise for consideration: i) in a grave error in acquitting the respondent nos.1 and 2 by holding that the prosecution failed to discharge its evidentiary burden as the evidence led by the prosecution was full of inconsistencies and contradictions; ii) whether the High Court erred in its finding that the trial was carried

Judgment PDF: Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah & Ors.
AI judgment summary Incoming

Source: Indian Supreme Court Judgments dataset, AWS Open Data, CC BY 4.0. A brief, not legal advice — read the judgment itself before relying on it.

More from the Supreme Court of India

  1. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 295Service law and pensionary benefits – Claim ofSupreme Court AllowedChhaganbhai Kohyabhai Pateliya and Others v. The State of Gujarat and Others
  2. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 277Tax/Taxation – M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 – Entry Tax Act 1976Supreme Court DismissedAddl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr.
  3. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 289Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings arising assaultSupreme Court AllowedSachin Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
  4. [2026] 10 S.C.R. 259Circumstantial Evidence – Conviction solely on the basis of, when not justifiedSupreme Court AllowedSantosh Gurung v. State of Sikkim